Leonard Cohen, The Future
Well, some visiting the website of most newspapers' or less famous, in addition to reading the study by the ecology of Vienna at a glance that says that in any serious accident at the Krsko contamination with radioactive iodine is in fact often more 'higher than in Chernobyl, you can' also be aware of any firm in central Japan (7 reactors) after an earthquake in 2007 and then stop for more 'than a year, with its exorbitant costs (investment not depreciated) of contaminated areas in Spain, which affected 1600 people (if you come in Italy to Termini central, you would like to be among those lucky 1600?) A waste treatment plant that English loses "only" 83,000 liters (2 ... mica) of water radioattive.Che maybe end up in some aquifers (and definitely somewhere sooner or later end up). So I ask, who wants nuclear power in Italy: they really want to "micro" nuclear accidents, which are not news, but they create serious damage to those who lives nearby and the environment can happen between us, and then among you, just 'cause you want to pay anything less than the electricity bill? (If this is true and certified prior to completing the installations ...). Really the game worth the candle? I honestly prefer the euro in more than a few health ', but clearly someone is both avviso.Comunque other, and it's not clear why the', continue to ignore the fact that these same economic relief, if not higher , would still be reachable with a good portion of solar energy, photovoltaic and eolica.Tutto this without the fault of human safety and the environment. Because 'there okay?
